Fieldbus device control system

ABSTRACT

A fieldbus system is provided, having a plurality of fieldbus devices and a controller. The controller is in communication with the plurality of fieldbus devices though a fieldbus. The controller transmits a plurality of high priority Receive Process Data Objects (RPDOs) and a plurality of low priority RPDOs to the plurality of fieldbus devices through the fieldbus. The controller includes a control logic for sending each of the plurality of fieldbus devices one of the plurality of high priority RPDOs during a frame. The frame is the fastest rate at which the high priority RPDOs are transmitted. The controller includes a control logic for sending at least one of the plurality of fieldbus devices at least one of the plurality of low priority RPDOs. The low priority RPDOs are grouped by a minimum wait time.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The subject matter disclosed herein relates to a fieldbus system, andmore specifically to a fieldbus system having a controller transmittinga plurality of high priority Receive Process Data Objects (RPDOs) andlow priority RPDOs to a plurality of fieldbus devices.

A fieldbus is employed to monitor and control one or more pieces ofproduction equipment such as, for example, sensors, actuators,electrical motors, or valves. A fieldbus is generally the equivalent ofa local area network (LAN) type connection that requires only onecommunication point at a controller and allows for multiple pieces ofproduction equipment to be connected concurrently. In one example, atransfer data protocol such as, for example, CANopen may be used toallow communication between the controller and the production equipment.Process data objects (PDOs) are used for broadcasting control and statusinformation between the controller and the production equipment.Specifically, in order to communicate data from the controller to theproduction equipment, a Receive Process Data Object (RPDO) message isused.

The controller sends both high and low priority RPDOs according to apredefined schedule that is based on the specific CANopen configurationand production equipment specifications. Thus, the controller istypically configured with a unique RPDO transmission schedule toaccommodate the RPDO transmission schedules of the production equipment.This means a firmware change is needed in the controller each time thespecific CANopen configuration or the production equipment is modified.Changing the firmware in the controller each time the CANopenconfiguration or the production equipment is modified may become timeconsuming and may also be costly.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the invention, a fieldbus system is provided,having a plurality of fieldbus devices and a controller. The controlleris in communication with the plurality of fieldbus devices though afieldbus. The controller transmits a plurality of high priority ReceiveProcess Data Objects (RPDOs) and a plurality of low priority RPDOs tothe plurality of fieldbus devices through the fieldbus. The controllerincludes a control logic for sending each of the plurality of fieldbusdevices one of the plurality of high priority RPDOs during a frame. Theframe is the fastest rate at which the plurality of high priority RPDOsare transmitted. The controller includes a control logic for sending, ifrequired, at least one of the plurality of fieldbus devices at least oneof the plurality of low priority RPDOs. The low priority RPDOs aregrouped by a minimum wait time. The controller includes a control logicfor defining, if required, at least one low priority thread. The lowpriority thread accommodates transmission scheduling of the plurality oflow priority RPDOs that have the same minimum wait time. The controllerincludes a control logic for preventing the low priority thread fromexecuting more than once during a frame. The controller includes acontrol logic for allowing each of the at least one low priority threadsto complete at least once during a sequence of frames referred to as asuperframe.

These and other advantages and features will become more apparent fromthe following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter, which is regarded as the invention, is particularlypointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion ofthe specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages ofthe invention are apparent from the following detailed description takenin conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an exemplary fieldbus system;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary RPDO transmitting schedulegenerated by a controller shown in FIG. 1;

FIGS. 3A-3B are a diagram illustrating another embodiment of an RPDOtransmitting schedule; and

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating yet another embodiment of an RPDOtransmitting schedule.

The detailed description explains embodiments of the invention, togetherwith advantages and features, by way of example with reference to thedrawings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As used herein the terms module and sub-module refer to an applicationspecific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor(shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that executes one or moresoftware or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/orother suitable components that provide the described functionality.

Referring now to FIG. 1, an exemplary schematic fieldbus system 10 isillustrated. The fieldbus system 10 includes a plurality of fieldbusdevices 20 and a controller 22. The controller 22 is in communicationwith each of the fieldbus devices 20 through a fieldbus 26. The fieldbussystem 10 utilizes a CANopen transfer data protocol to exchange messagesbetween the controller 22 and the fieldbus devices 20. In one exemplaryembodiment, the fieldbus system 10 may be used in conjunction with a gasturbine (not shown), where the fieldbus devices 20 are fuel valves forthe gas turbine. However, it is understood that the fieldbus system 10may be employed in a variety of automation applications, and that thefieldbus devices 20 may be any type of production equipment such as, forexample, sensors, actuators, electrical motors, or valves.

Process data objects (PDOs) are transmitted over the fieldbus 26 and areused for broadcasting control and status information between thecontroller 22 and the fieldbus devices 20. Specifically, PDOs are usedin CANopen for broadcasting high and low priority control and statusinformation. Data from the fieldbus devices 20 are communicated to thecontroller using Transmitting Receive Process Data Objects (TPDO)messages, and data from the controller 22 is communicated to thefieldbus devices 20 using Receive Process Data Object (RPDO) messages.In one embodiment, the controller 22 transmits both high priority RPDOsand low priority RPDOs to the fieldbus devices 20 through the fieldbus26.

In the embodiment as shown in FIG. 1, the controller 22 includes anelectrically erasable and reprogrammable memory such as, for example,flash memory that can be erased and reprogrammed repeatedly by aconfiguration tool 30. The configuration tool 30 includes control logicfor creating and transferring one or more configuration files 32 to thecontroller 22. The configuration tool 30 reconfigures the controller 22,but does not alter the firmware of the controller 22. Specifically, adata file 34 containing information regarding all of the possiblefieldbus devices that may be supported by the fieldbus system 10 isloaded by the configuration tool 30. In one embodiment the data files 34could include a dynamic link library file extension (i.e. a .DLL file),however, it is understood that that the data files 34 could includeother file extensions as well. The configuration tool 30 includes aninterface for allowing a user to enter input that defines the specificfieldbus devices 20 that are actually supported by the fieldbus system10. For example, in the exemplary embodiment as shown, a user wouldselect the three fieldbus devices 20 through a user interface (notshown) of the configuration tool 30.

The configuration tool 30 includes control logic for creating theconfiguration files 32 based on the data files 34 as well as thespecific fieldbus devices 20 that were defined by a user. Eachconfiguration file 32 is saved in the memory of the controller 22 andcontains information regarding the characteristics of the fieldbusdevices 20 that are employed within the fieldbus system 10. Thecharacteristics of the fieldbus devices 20 include the RPDO transmittingschedule of the fieldbus device 20.

The controller 22 includes control logic for sending RPDOs to thefieldbus devices 20 according to a specified RPDO transmitting schedule.Turning now to FIG. 2, an exemplary illustration of one type of RPDOtransmitting schedule that is generated by a scheduling algorithm of thecontroller 22 is illustrated. In the embodiment as shown, the fieldbussystem 10 employs five different fieldbus device 20, and the controller22 sends RPDO1, RPDO2 and RPDO3 to the fieldbus devices 20. RPDO1 is ahigh priority RPDO 42. RPDO2 and RPDO3 are low priority RPDOs that areindicated by reference number 40. The RPDOs 40 and 42 are transmitted bythe controller 22 in groups or clusters, which are referred to asslices. The slice with the high priority RPDOs 42 are transmitted onlyonce during a frame 44, and no more. A frame rate is the rate at whichthe high priority RPDOs 42 are transmitted, and is defined as the baseexecution rate of the application. In the exemplary embodiment as shown,the frame rate is about 10 ms (milliseconds), however it is to beunderstood that other frame rates may be used as well. The high priorityRPDOs 42 are transmitted to each and every one of the fieldbus devices20 during each frame 44.

The controller 22 includes control logic for transmitting the lowpriority RPDOs 40 to the fieldbus devices 20 no more than once a frame44. In the embodiment as shown, the fieldbus devices 20 each havemultiple low priority RPDOs 40, where each of the low priority RPDOs 40for a single fieldbus device 20 are all transmitted in a single slice. Aminimum wait time is associated with the low priority PRDOs 40. In theembodiment as shown in FIG. 2, the minimum wait time is about 10 ms,however it is to be understood that other time periods may be used aswell. The low priority RPDOs 40 are grouped by the minimum wait time.The minimum wait time may be the same as, less, or more than the framerate. However, the low priority RPDOs 40 can not be transmitted morethan once a frame 44.

In the exemplary embodiment as shown in FIG. 2, all of the low priorityRPDOs 40 have the same minimum wait time. A thread is defined as asequence of either high priority RPDOs 42 or low priority RPDOs 40 thatshare the same minimum wait time. During a minimum wait time interval,the low priority RPDOs 40 are transmitted to each of the fieldbusdevices 20 one at a time, in a round-robin configuration. That is, thecontroller 22 includes control logic for assigning an equal amount oftime to transmit each of the low priority RPDOs 40, and transmits theRPDOs 40 in a circular order. It should be noted that a low priorityRPDO 40 thread repeats no more than once a frame 44, but could takelonger than one frame 44 depending on the minimum wait time.

A superframe 46 is defined as the number of frames 44 that are neededfor all of the low priority RPDO threads to complete at least at leastonce. In the exemplary embodiment as shown, the superframe 46 is about50 ms, however it is to be understood that other time periods may beused as well. In one embodiment, the number of frames 44 in thesuperframe 46 may be calculated based on the frame rate, the number ofhigh priority RPDOs 42 each fieldbus device 20 receives, the number oflow priority RPDOs 40 each fieldbus device 20 receives, and theassociated minimum wait times. Specifically, the number of frames 44 inthe superframe 46 defines the transmitting schedule of the RPDOs, andmay be calculated by the following formula:

$n_{s} = \left\{ {\left\lbrack {L\; C\; {{M\left( {\frac{p_{frame}}{p_{{MinWait}\; 1}},d_{{MinWait}\; 1}} \right)}/\frac{p_{Frame}}{p_{{MinWait}\; 1}}}} \right\rbrack,\ldots \;,\left\lbrack {L\; C\; {{M\left( {\frac{p_{frame}}{p_{{MinWait}_{i}}},d_{{MinWait}_{i}}} \right)}/\frac{p_{Frame}}{p_{{MinWait}_{i}}}}} \right\rbrack} \right\}$

In the equation stated above, n_(s) is the number of frames 44 in thesuperframe 46, d_(MinWait) is the number of fieldbus devices 20 with lowpriority RPDOs 40 that share the same minimum wait time, p_(frame) isthe frame rate in ms, p_(MinWait) is the minimum wait time of the lowpriority RPDOs 40 in ms, i is the number of different minimum wait timesbetween each of the fieldbus devices 20, and LCM is the least commonmultiple of either p_(frame) divided by p_(MinWait), or p_(frame)divided by d_(MinWait).

A tick is a point in time in which the slices of the RPDOs 40 and 42 aretransmitted. For example, in the embodiment as shown in FIG. 2, the tickis about 1 ms interval. The low and high priority RPDOs 40 and 42 may beoffset from a frame boundary 50 by a period of time. For example, thetransmission of the RPDOs 40 and 42 may be offset from the boundary 50by an offset value in ticks or milliseconds. The offset value range isbetween about zero and about the number of ticks in a frame 44 minus onetick. FIG. 2 illustrates the high priority RPDOs 42 with an offset ofabout 3 ms, and the low priority RPDOs 40 with an offset of about 0 ms.

Turning now to FIGS. 3A-3B, an exemplary illustration of another RPDOtransmitting schedule is illustrated. In the embodiment as shown, thefieldbus system 10 employs five different fieldbus devices 20. RPDO1 isa high priority RPDO 142. RPDO2 and RPDO3 are low priority RPDOs thatare indicated by reference number 140. In the exemplary embodiment asshown in FIGS. 3A-3B, the frame rate is about 10 ms. The minimum waittime for the low priority RPDOs 140 is about 10 ms. FIGS. 3A-3Billustrate all of the low priority RPDOs 140 having the same minimumwait time. The superframe 146 is about 200 ms. FIGS. 3A-3B alsoillustrates the high priority RPDOs 142 with an offset of about 3 ms,and the low priority RPDOs 40 with an offset of about 0 ms. The highpriority RPDOs 142 are illustrated as thread 1, and the low priorityRPDOs 140 are illustrated as thread 2. It should be noted that unlikethe embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, FIGS. 3A-3B illustrates the lowpriority RPDOs 40 for a single fieldbus device 20 being transmitted inmultiple slices during a superframe 146.

In yet another embodiment, an RPDO transmitting schedule with only lowpriority RPDOs and no high priority RPDOs may be employed as well.Turning now to FIG. 4, a transmitting schedule employing only lowpriority RPDOs 240 is illustrated. In the exemplary embodiment as shown,the fieldbus system 10 employs three different fieldbus devices 20,where RPDO1 and RPDO2 are low priority RPDOs that are indicated byreference number 240. All three of the fieldbus devices 20 receiveRPDO1, and two of the fieldbus devices 20 receive RPDO2. The frame rateis about 10 ms. In the embodiment as shown in FIG. 4, the frame rate isthe rate at which a single low priority RPDO 240 is transmitted, and isdefined as the base execution rate of the application. The minimum waittime for low priority RPDO1 is about 10 ms, and is referred to as thread1. The minimum wait time for low priority RPDO2 is about 20 ms, and isreferred to as thread 2. The superframe 146 is about 120 ms. RPDO1includes an offset of about 0 ms, and RPDO2 includes an offset of about0 ms.

The scheduling algorithm output examples as illustrated in each of FIGS.2-4 may be specified by the configuration tool 30 as a reconfigurationof the controller 22 without changing the firmware in the controller 22.Currently, in one approach, a controller typically requires a firmwarechange each time the specific CANopen configuration or the productionequipment is modified. However, changing the firmware in the controllereach time the CANopen configuration or the production equipment ismodified may become time consuming and may also be costly. Thus, thescheduling algorithm allows for increased efficiency and reduced cost.Moreover, the scheduling algorithm also allows for the specific datafiles 34 (shown in FIG. 1) to be loaded to the configuration tool 30once, where a user then defines the specific fieldbus device 20 that areemployed within the fieldbus system 10. Thus, the configuration tool 30does not typically need to be re-programmed with a new data file 34 ifthe number or type of fieldbus devices 20 in the fieldbus system 10changes.

While the invention has been described in detail in connection with onlya limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood thatthe invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, theinvention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations,alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretoforedescribed, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of theinvention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention havebeen described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention mayinclude only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, theinvention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, butis only limited by the scope of the appended claims.

1. A fieldbus system, comprising: a plurality of fieldbus devices; a controller in communication with the plurality of fieldbus devices through a fieldbus, the controller transmitting a plurality of high priority Receive Process Data Objects (RPDOs) and a plurality of low priority RPDOs to the plurality of fieldbus devices through the fieldbus, the controller including: a control logic for sending each of the plurality of fieldbus devices one of the plurality of high priority RPDOs during a frame, the frame being the fastest rate at which the plurality of high priority RPDOs are transmitted; a control logic for sending at least one of the plurality of fieldbus devices at least one of the plurality of low priority RPDOs, the plurality of low priority RPDOs being transmitted after a minimum wait time; a control logic for defining at least one low priority thread, the at least one low priority thread being the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time; a control logic for preventing the at least one low priority thread from being sent more than once during a frame; and a control logic for allowing each of the at least one low priority threads to complete at least once during a superframe.
 2. The fieldbus system of claim 1, wherein the superframe is defined as a number of frames needed to allow for each of the at least one low priority threads to complete at least once.
 3. The fieldbus system of claim 2, wherein the number of frames in the superframe is based on a number of the plurality of fieldbus devices with the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time, a frame rate in ms, the minimum wait time of the plurality of low priority RPDOs in ms, and a number of different minimum wait times between each of the plurality of fieldbus devices.
 4. The fieldbus system of claim 3, wherein the number of frames in the superframe is calculated by the following formula: $n_{s} = \left\{ {\left\lbrack {L\; C\; {{M\left( {\frac{p_{frame}}{p_{{MinWait}\; 1}},d_{{MinWait}\; 1}} \right)}/\frac{p_{Frame}}{p_{{MinWait}\; 1}}}} \right\rbrack,\ldots \;,\left\lbrack {L\; C\; {{M\left( {\frac{p_{frame}}{p_{{MinWait}_{i}}},d_{{MinWait}_{i}}} \right)}/\frac{p_{Frame}}{p_{{MinWait}_{i}}}}} \right\rbrack} \right\}$ wherein n_(s) is the number of frames in the superframe, d_(MinWait) is the number of the plurality of fieldbus devices with the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time, p_(frame) is the frame rate in ms, p_(MinWait) is the minimum wait time of the plurality of low priority RPDOs in ms, i is the number of different minimum wait times between each of the plurality of fieldbus devices, and a least common multiple LCM is of p_(frame) divided by p_(MinWait), and p_(frame) divided by d_(MinWait).
 5. The fieldbus system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of low priority RPDOs are sent to each of the plurality of fieldbus devices one at a time in a round-robin configuration.
 6. The fieldbus system of claim 1, further comprising a configuration tool including control logic for transferring at least one configuration file to the controller.
 7. The fieldbus system of claim 6, wherein the configuration tool includes an interface for receiving an input that defines the plurality of fieldbus devices that are included with the fieldbus system.
 8. The fieldbus system of claim 7, wherein the configuration tool includes control logic for generating the at least one configuration file based on the input from the interface and a data file that contains information regarding all possible configurations for the plurality of fieldbus devices potentially supported by the fieldbus system.
 9. The fieldbus system of claim 1, wherein a CANopen data protocol is used for communication between the controller and the plurality of fieldbus devices.
 10. The fieldbus system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of fieldbus devices are fuel valves for a gas turbine.
 11. A fieldbus system, comprising: a plurality of fieldbus devices; a controller in communication with the plurality of fieldbus devices though a fieldbus where a CANopen data protocol is used for communication between the controller and the plurality of fieldbus devices, the controller transmitting a plurality of high priority Receive Process Data Objects (RPDOs) and a plurality of low priority RPDOs to the plurality of fieldbus devices through the fieldbus, the controller including: a control logic for sending each of the plurality of fieldbus devices one of the plurality of high priority RPDOs during a frame, the frame being the fastest rate at which the plurality of high priority RPDOs are transmitted; a control logic for sending at least one of the plurality of fieldbus devices at least one of the plurality of low priority RPDOs, the plurality of low priority RPDOs being transmitted after a minimum wait time; a control logic for defining at least one low priority thread, the at least one low priority thread being the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time; a control logic for preventing the at least one low priority thread from being sent more than once during a frame; and a control logic for allowing each of the at least one low priority threads to complete at least once during a superframe, the superframe being a number of frames needed to allow for each of the at least one low priority threads to complete at least once.
 12. The fieldbus system of claim 11, wherein the number of frames in the superframe is based on a number of the plurality of fieldbus devices with the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time, a frame rate in ms, the minimum wait time of the plurality of low priority RPDOs in ms, and a number of different minimum wait times between each of the plurality of fieldbus devices.
 13. The fieldbus system of claim 12, wherein the number of frames in the superframe is calculated by the following formula: $n_{s} = \left\{ {\left\lbrack {L\; C\; {{M\left( {\frac{p_{frame}}{p_{{MinWait}\; 1}},d_{{MinWait}\; 1}} \right)}/\frac{p_{Frame}}{p_{{MinWait}\; 1}}}} \right\rbrack,\ldots \;,\left\lbrack {L\; C\; {{M\left( {\frac{p_{frame}}{p_{{MinWait}_{i}}},d_{{MinWait}_{i}}} \right)}/\frac{p_{Frame}}{p_{{MinWait}_{i}}}}} \right\rbrack} \right\}$ wherein n_(s) is the number of frames in the superframe, d_(MinWait) is the number of the plurality of fieldbus devices with the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time, p_(frame) is the frame rate in ms, p_(MinWait) is the minimum wait time of the plurality of low priority RPDOs in ms, i is the number of different minimum wait times between each of the plurality of fieldbus devices, and a least common multiple LCM is of p_(frame) divided by p_(MinWait), and p_(frame) divided by d_(MinWait).
 14. The fieldbus system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of low priority RPDOs are sent to each of the plurality of fieldbus devices one at a time in a round-robin configuration.
 15. The fieldbus system of claim 11, further comprising a configuration tool including control logic for transferring at least one configuration file to the controller.
 16. The fieldbus system of claim 15, wherein the configuration tool includes an interface for receiving an input that defines the plurality of fieldbus devices that are included with the fieldbus system.
 17. The fieldbus system of claim 16, wherein the configuration tool includes control logic for generating the at least one configuration file based on the input from the interface and a data file that contains information regarding all possible configurations for the plurality of fieldbus devices potentially supported by the fieldbus system.
 18. The fieldbus system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of fieldbus devices are fuel valves for a gas turbine.
 19. A fieldbus system, comprising: a plurality of fieldbus devices; a controller in communication with the plurality of fieldbus devices though a fieldbus, the controller transmitting a plurality of low priority RPDOs to the plurality of fieldbus devices through the fieldbus, the controller including: a control logic for sending one of the plurality of fieldbus devices the plurality of low priority RPDOs during a frame, the frame being the base execution rate and the fastest rate at which the plurality of low priority RPDOs are transmitted, the plurality of low priority RPDOs being transmitted after a minimum wait time; a control logic for defining at least one low priority thread, the at least one low priority thread being the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time; a control logic for preventing the at least one low priority thread from being sent more than once during a frame; and a control logic for allowing each of the at least one low priority threads to complete at least once during a superframe, the superframe being a number of frames needed to allow for each of the at least one low priority threads to complete at least once.
 20. The fieldbus system of claim 19, wherein the number of frames in the superframe is based on a number of the plurality of fieldbus devices with the plurality of low priority RPDOs that share the same minimum wait time, a frame rate in ms, the minimum wait time of the plurality of low priority RPDOs in ms, and a number of different minimum wait times between each of the plurality of fieldbus devices. 